Previous Projects
2008 - 2010: Hydrate Kinetics in Pipelines
Calsep has developed a new algorithm for solving mass transfer limited hydrate growth
in a pipeline environment. The hydrate kinetics model used was originally developed
by Skovborg based on well-controlled laboratory experiments carried out at constant
temperature and with a constant interfacial area between water and hydrocarbons.
To apply the growth model for pipeline transport, variations in the interfacial
area and heat effects must be taken into consideration.
The new algorithm includes three parts,
- An implicit procedure for solving the differential equations governing mass and
heat transport
- A hydrate flash algorithm that works for an aqueous phase with dissolved hydrocarbons.
The flash does not consider the free hydrocarbon phases, which in system with hydrate
growth are not necessarily in equilibrium with the water phase.
- A pipeline discretization algorithm, which assures that the mass and heat transport
equations are solved with good accuracy and speed.
2005-2007: Research Project on Asphaltene Modeling
BACKGROUND
The exact nature of asphaltenes and the mechanisms behind aspahltene precipitation
are not fully understood. This makes it very difficult to develop an accurate and
reliable model for asphaltenes. There are today no standardized measurements on
asphaltenes that could be used to tune the model to obtain more accurate simulation
results.
ASPHALTENES
Asphaltenes may precipitate from petroleum reservoir fluids as a highly viscous
and sticky material that is likely to cause deposition problems in production wells
and process equipment.
WORK TO DATE
The available models have been reviewed and the most likely candidate for success
has been found in the PC-SAFT model (Perturbed Chain Statistical Association Fluid
Theory). The PC-SAFT model also shows promising results in equilibrium calculations.
This indicates that the model could be used for the whole spectrum of thermodynamic
calculations.
MODEL REQUIREMENTS
A satisfactory asphaltene model must quantitatively handle gas-oil-asphaltene equilibria
at reservoir and production conditions. It must be sensitive to pressure to represent
the phase splits occurring at isothermal conditions as a result of a pressure reduction.
This requires a very accurate description of the volumetric behavior of both the
oil and the asphaltene phase at high pressures. An important aspect of asphaltene
phase behavior is the possible asphaltene precipitation in connection with Enhanced
Oil Recovery (EOR). The model should quantitatively assess the influence on the
asphaltene onset pressure of a possible injection of natural gas or CO2.
2003-2004: Characterization of Heavy Oils
In 2003-2004 ConocoPhillips, Shell and Statoil sponsored a Heavy Oil JIP. The sponsor
companies all had valuable PVT data for heavy oils, which PVT data existing fluid
characterization methods had difficulties modeling. A characterization procedure
for heavy oils was developed that successfully modeled the phase behavior of heavy
oil mixtures with an API Gravity as low as 10. It was further clarified how to avoid
the simulated liquid-liquid splits that often cause problems for compositional reservoir
simulators. In the same project the Corresponding States (CSP) viscosity model was
extended to also cover heavy oils. Some of the oils dealt with in the project had
viscosities of several thousand centipoises.
2001-2002: Modeling of Vertical Compositional Variations in Reservoirs with a Temperature
Gradient
In 2001-2002 Calsep carried out a JIP to model the influence of a temperature gradient
on the compositional variation with depth in a petroleum reservoir. The influence
of gravity had long been known. Gravity will make the concentration of heavy molecular
weight compounds increase with depth. Data from the sponsoring companies, Norsk
Hydro and Chevron, showed that the temperature increase with depth seen in most
reservoirs strengthens the compositional variation. Calsep developed a model based
on irreversible thermodynamics matching the observed compositional trend.
1990-1997: Hydrate Kinetics
In the period from 1990 to 1997 Calsep with support from Mærsk Olie og Gas
AS and the Danish Energy Agency conducted two hydrate kinetics research projects.
When a well stream carrying formation water is transported in a pipeline, hydrate
formation is a potential risk. Adding methanol or other hydrate inhibitor to the
well stream can prevent hydrate formation. For economic and environmental reasons
it is however desirable to keep the consumption of hydrate inhibitors low. No hydrates
will form as long as the pipeline temperature is above the hydrate formation temperature.
Hydrates may however form during shutdown and the rate of formation determines how
long a pipeline can be shut down before restart becomes impossible. The hydrate
kinetics projects carried out by Calsep showed that hydrate formation rate is determined
by the transport of hydrocarbon gas components from the gas and oil phases to the
water phase.
1989-1990: Development of Wax Models and Measurement Techniques
In 1989-1990 Calsep headed a research project within wax precipitation from reservoir
fluids. Oil companies with licenses to explore in the Danish sector in the North
Sea had to support oil and gas research in Denmark. Statoil spent some of that money
on a joint project between Calsep, The Risø National Laboratories and Statoil.
Four publications in Energy and Fuel from 1991 describe the results of the work,
which include wax formation temperatures measured using 3 different techniques,
amount of wax precipitated below the wax formation temperature and a new model for
simulating wax precipitation. These articles are still some of the most cited wax
articles in literature.
1985-1986: Hydrate Equilibrium Model Development
With support from Danish Department of Energy and with participation from Danish
engineering companies Calsep in 1985-1986 conducted a project to develop a gas hydrate
equilibrium model. Gas hydrates had become a problem in Danish gas storages and
was also seen as a potential problem in the Danish part of North Sea when the pipeline
network was further developed. The gas hydrate adsorption model developed in the
project is still the backbone of the PVTsim Hydrate Module.
1982-1985: C7+ Characterization
In the early 1980s Statoil entrusted Calsep the challenging job of developing a
new C7+ characterization procedure. Statoil had decided to set new standards for
EOS modeling of reservoir fluids. The key was improved compositional analyses. Until
that time it was seldom to see reservoir fluid compositions to higher carbon numbers
than C7+. Statoil made True Boiling Point (TBP) analyses to C20+ or even C30+ and
later on high temperature liquid chromatography analyses. This compositional data
material showed that the logarithm of the mole fraction of a C7+ mole fraction decreases
approximately linearly with carbon number. This was the start of the era with predictive
EOS modeling. Regression could be limited to fine-tuning and cases requiring heavy
lumping.